Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40795974›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.

Hyosub E Kim, Romeo Chua, Davin Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyosub E KimKinesiology; Neuroscience, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-593X
Romeo ChuaKinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Davin HuKinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensorimotor system must constantly decide which errors to learn from and which to ignore. Recent work has shown that humans are remarkably precise in parsing movement errors into internally and externally generated components for this purpose: participants automatically ignore internally generated reaching errors caused by motor noise, yet implicitly adapt to size-matched externally generated errors caused by visual perturbations. Following replication of these results with 16 neurotypical adults, we formalized our understanding of this behaviour with a novel Bayesian decision-making model. The Parsing of Internal and External Causes of Error (PIECE) model frames adaptation as a process of causal inference regarding the source of error, with the magnitude of motor corrections reflecting a combination of state estimation and the observer's degree-of-belief that their movement was externally perturbed. Thus, PIECE challenges current computational theories that posit adaptation as a process of re-aligning the perceived hand position with the movement goal. When formally compared with three representative models of this hand-to-target alignment view, we show that only PIECE can capture the precise parsing of internal versus external errors observed. Combined, this work provides a normative explanation of how the nervous system discounts intrinsic motor noise and adapts to perturbations, keeping movements finely calibrated.

Indexed as

LearningPsychomotor PerformanceAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultBayesian modellingcausal inferencedecision-makingmotor adaptationmotor learningstate estimation

Identifiers

PMID40795974
PMCPMC12343128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.