ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2025
SimSmoke simulation models distinguished by race/ethnicity: past and future trends and the potential role of policy.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SimSmoke simulation models by educational status: past and future US trends and the potential role of policy.Tobacco control · 2025Article
- Dynamics that predispose, enable, and reinforce commercial tobacco-related health disparities: Introduction to a Monograph.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPolicy interventions to reduce racial/ethnic cigarette smoking and related health disparities are needed to improve health equity. Simulation models can be useful in gauging the impact of tobacco control policies on trends in smoking-related outcomes, but few have systematically analyzed the impact of tobacco control policies across racial/ethnic groups.
methodsWe developed 3 separate SimSmoke models for the non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic populations. Following a first-order Markov process, population projections evolve through net immigration and death rates, and smoking prevalence evolves through initiation, cessation, and relapse. The models incorporate policies implemented from 2011 to 2023 and are used to consider trends in NHW, NHB, and Hispanic smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable death and the impact of policies on those trends.
resultsThe models indicate major differences in smoking trends and smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) among NHW, NHB, and Hispanic adults, with NHB males experiencing the smallest smoking decline through 2023 and having the highest 2023 smoking prevalence. The models predict major differences in the impact of tobacco control policies, especially the greater effect of cigarette taxes on NHB and Hispanic adults than NHW adults and the reduced impact of T21 laws on NHB compared to NHW and Hispanic adults. DISCUSSION: The models predict large differences in levels and rates of decline in NHW, NHB, and Hispanic smoking prevalence, leading to widening health disparities between racial/ethnic groups. Further study is needed on differential race/ethnicity impacts of tobacco control policies and the role of cigars, e-cigarettes, and other product use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.