ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026
The National Health Service-Galleri multicancer screening trial: explanation and justification of unique and important design issues.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive screening in hereditary cancer: a randomized controlled trial to test cell-free DNA-based early detection in the CHARM consortium.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Trial
- The Vanguard Study: Assessing feasibility of conducting randomized trials of novel multi-cancer detection tests.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer: Current and Emerging Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Where Does Liquid Biopsy Add Value in Thyroid Cancer? Biological Rationale, Technological Innovation, and Clinical Utility.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite there being a plethora of multicancer early detection tests, the National Health Service (NHS)-Galleri (ISRCTN91431511) is the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multicancer liquid biopsy in a screening setting thus far. The NHS-Galleri trial has generated much debate, and it has been criticized in the medical press. Some of these criticisms stem from differing opinions over the choice of primary endpoint, others from poor reporting in statements to journalists from those not directly involved in the trial. Some of the debate is positive and relates to the speed of enrollment and the equity in participation, which have shown what is possible in large population-based RCTs. Here we explain our reasoning for undertaking the trial and designing it the way we did. We focus on the reason to consider multicancer screening and why we felt that the results from nonrandomized clinical studies of GRAIL's Galleri test justified a large RCT. We also consider the slow progress in adopting effective cancer screening historically and in reducing cancer mortality through early detection. There is a need to plan now for future research and implementation depending on the results of the trial. NHS-Galleri is the first double-blind cancer screening RCT. It also, unusually, uses late-stage cancer incidence (rather than cancer mortality) as its primary outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.