ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2025
A survey of biclustering and clustering methods in clustering different types of single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAdir: Joint clustering of cells and genes for single-cell transcriptomics with visualization-driven cluster quality assessment.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Direct detection of rare circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by scRNA seq: Spike-in strategy based feasibility study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Adaptive deep clustering integrating DINOv2 embeddings, graph attention, and bio-inspired optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has garnered considerable attention as it enables the exploration of cellular heterogeneity from a single-cell perspective. Various unsupervised methods, such as biclustering and clustering methods, offer a theoretical foundation for understanding the structure and function of cells. However, accurately identifying cell subtypes within complex scRNA-seq data remains challenging. To evaluate the current development status; summarize the strengths, weaknesses, and improvement strategies of unsupervised methods; and provide guidelines for future research, we surveyed five biclustering and 21 clustering methods applied to different types of scRNA-seq datasets. We employed three external and two internal metrics to determine clustering performance on 10 publicly available real datasets. Dataset properties are quantified from six perspectives to discover the most suitable biclustering or clustering methods. The results of this survey indicate that biclustering methods are effective for identifying local consistency or for deeply mining partially annotated datasets. Conversely, clustering methods are more suitable for dealing with unknown datasets. This survey aids in identifying cellular heterogeneity by recommending appropriate methods based on different dataset characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.