Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40795763›Full record

ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2025

A survey of biclustering and clustering methods in clustering different types of single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Chaowang Lan, Xiaoqi Tang, Caihua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chaowang LanSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China.
Xiaoqi TangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China.
Caihua LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China.

Funding

Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Fund 2021AC19207Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China 21YJC870009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has garnered considerable attention as it enables the exploration of cellular heterogeneity from a single-cell perspective. Various unsupervised methods, such as biclustering and clustering methods, offer a theoretical foundation for understanding the structure and function of cells. However, accurately identifying cell subtypes within complex scRNA-seq data remains challenging. To evaluate the current development status; summarize the strengths, weaknesses, and improvement strategies of unsupervised methods; and provide guidelines for future research, we surveyed five biclustering and 21 clustering methods applied to different types of scRNA-seq datasets. We employed three external and two internal metrics to determine clustering performance on 10 publicly available real datasets. Dataset properties are quantified from six perspectives to discover the most suitable biclustering or clustering methods. The results of this survey indicate that biclustering methods are effective for identifying local consistency or for deeply mining partially annotated datasets. Conversely, clustering methods are more suitable for dealing with unknown datasets. This survey aids in identifying cellular heterogeneity by recommending appropriate methods based on different dataset characteristics.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyHumansbiclusteringclusteringdataset propertiesscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40795763
PMCPMC12342763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.