Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40795406›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2025

Occupational disparities in common cancer screening participation among workers: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

Kazuhiko Watanabe, Takahiro Tabuchi, Masayoshi Zaitsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazuhiko WatanabeCenter for Research of the Aging Workforce, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-4679
Takahiro TabuchiDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-3125
Masayoshi ZaitsuCenter for Research of the Aging Workforce, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-355X

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCancer screening is crucial for early detection and improved health outcomes. Limited evidence exists on the association between occupational class and cancer screening participation in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to examine screening participation rates and disparities among active workers across different occupational classes.

methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed data from a nationwide web-based survey conducted in Japan (September to November, 2023). Eligible participants included current workers aged 40-64 years for colorectal, lung, and stomach cancer screenings (n = 7038); workers aged 40-64 years for breast cancer screening (n = 2929); and workers aged 30-64 years for cervical cancer screening (n = 4252). Cancer screening participation rates across occupational classes (upper nonmanual, lower nonmanual, and manual workers) were compared using the chi-square test. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs for nonparticipation, adjusted for sex, age, educational attainment, household income, and workplace scale. Upper nonmanual workers served as the reference group.

resultsManual workers consistently had lower cancer screening participation rates. Compared with upper nonmanual workers, manual workers exhibited significantly higher PRs for nonparticipation in colorectal (PR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22), lung (PR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34), stomach (PR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), and cervical cancer screenings (PR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33). The disparities were particularly pronounced among male workers.

conclusionsManual workers had lower cancer screening participation rates, particularly for colorectal, lung, stomach, and cervical cancer. Targeted interventions are needed to improve screening, particularly among manual workers, and reduce occupational disparities in cancer prevention and outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerOccupationsAdultColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical Neoplasmscancer screeningdisparitymanual workeroccupational classprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40795406
PMCPMC12445672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.