ArticleThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025
Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.
Article in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the differences in executive functions, specifically cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, between schizophrenia (SCH) patients with predominantly positive symptoms (PSD) and those with predominantly negative symptoms (NSD), compared to healthy controls, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
methodsFifty-two patients with SCH and 29 control subjects were recruited in the study. We employed fNIRS to measure brain activation while participants performed 2 tasks: a cognitive flexibility-switching task and the Stroop task, which assesses inhibitory control. Performance metrics included accuracy and reaction time. The study included 3 groups: SCH patients with PSD, SCH patients with NSD, and healthy controls.
resultsPatients with SCH exhibited lower accuracy and longer reaction times compared to healthy controls. In terms of brain activation, the PSD group showed the highest levels of prefrontal activation, followed by healthy controls, while the NSD group had the lowest activation levels. Patients had lower accuracy and longer reaction times than healthy controls. The PSD group showed excessive activation in both prefrontal cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during both the congruent condition and incongruent condition of the Stroop task. In contrast, the NSD group exhibited higher prefrontal activation under congruent conditions but significantly reduced activation under incongruent conditions.
conclusionOur findings highlight distinct patterns of executive function deficits and brain activation in SCH patients with PSD and NSD. These results suggest that symptom profiles may influence the nature and severity of cognitive impairments and associated neural mechanisms. Future research should further explore these differences to inform targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes for individuals with SCH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.