Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40795331›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025

Trajectory of efficacy and safety across ulotaront dose levels in schizophrenia: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Yu-Chia Hsu, Tzu-Yen Hung, Yang-Chieh Brian Chen, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Chih-Sung Liang, Ping-Tao Tseng, Yu-Kang Tu, Christoph U Correll, Chih-Wei Hsu, Marco Solmi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu-Chia HsuDepartment of Medical Education, National Cheng Kung University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Yen HungDepartment of Medical Education, National Cheng Kung University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yang-Chieh Brian ChenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Kuo-Chuan HungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Sung LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-5586
Ping-Tao TsengProspect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-7800
Yu-Kang TuInstitute of Health Data Analytics & Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2461-474X
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Chih-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-4060
Marco SolmiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Chang Gung Medical Foundation BMRPJ30Chang Gung Medical Foundation CMRPG8N0881Chang Gung Medical Foundation CMRPG8P0631Chang Gung Medical Foundation CORPG8P056,1Taiwan National Science and Technology Council 109-2314-B-182A-009-MY2Taiwan National Science and Technology Council 111-2314-B-182A-027Taiwan National Science and Technology Council 112-2314-B-182-070-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUlotaront is an experimental antipsychotic for schizophrenia, but its optimal dose is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate dose-response relationships for efficacy and safety in people with schizophrenia.

methodsA systematic review of four databases (until January 22, 2025; INPLASY202510091) identified randomized clinical trials assessing ulotaront. Outcomes included efficacy, measured by changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (primary outcome), positive and negative subdomains, and the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity, and safety, assessed by all-cause dropout (co-primary outcome, dropout due to adverse event, serious, non-serious, and specific adverse events). We employed one-stage dose-response meta-analysis (random-effects model) calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsAnalysis of three randomized clinical trials (n = 1144) indicated that the 100 mg dose of ulotaront provided the greatest improvement in PANSS total score (standardized mean difference = -0.23 [95% CI: -0.43, -0.02]), PANSS positive symptom score (-0.30 [-0.70, 0.10]), and PANSS negative symptom score (-0.28 [-0.48, -0.08]). However, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity scores did not exhibit a clear dose-response relationship. Regarding safety, all-cause dropout (RR at 100 mg = 1.10 [95% CI: 0.57, 2.12]), adverse event-related dropout, serious, non-serious, and most specific adverse events showed no significant dose-response relationship. The risk of anxiety-related adverse events was significantly higher than placebo at 50 and 75 mg doses (RR at 75 mg = 2.06 [95% CI: 1.11, 3.80]).

conclusionUlotaront 100 mg appears greatest efficacy with favorable safety for acute schizophrenia. However, effect sizes were small, and higher ulotaront doses should be tested. Significance Statement Ulotaront is a new medication being tested for treating schizophrenia. Unlike most existing antipsychotic drugs that block dopamine receptors in the brain, ulotaront works through a different mechanism by activating trace amine-associated receptor 1 and serotonin 1A receptors. These novel targets may help reduce both hallucinations and negative symptoms like social withdrawal and lack of motivation, with fewer side effects. In this study, we analyzed data from several clinical trials to understand how different doses of ulotaront affect patients. We found that higher doses-especially around 100 mg-can improve schizophrenia symptoms without increasing safety concerns. These findings are important because they suggest that ulotaront may offer a new and safer treatment option for people with schizophrenia, and they help guide doctors toward the most effective dose.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSchizophreniaDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntipsychotic AgentsacceptabilityeffectivenesspsychosisSEP-363856tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40795331
PMCPMC12421877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.