ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Preventing smartphone induction of magnet mode in cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ECG-Capable Smartwatches Can Induce Magnet Mode in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Magnetic interference from consumer devices: a renewed challenge for the safety of cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWireless charging capable smartphones may interact with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). We hypothesized that magnetic shielding with a steel plate placed at the back of a smartphone may prevent interaction. METHODS AND
resultsSixteen CIED (6 pacemakers and 10 implantable cardioverters/defibrillators) from all manufacturers were consecutively implanted in a subcutaneous and submuscular location in an isolated porcine thorax and connected to an interactive heart simulator. Two smartphones (Apple iPhone 14 and Google Pixel 8 Pro) were placed on top of the implantation site, and signs of magnet mode induction were recorded. The Apple iPhone induced magnet mode in seven of 16 (44%) subcutaneously placed CIED. Placed in a magnetic phone case, the Apple iPhone induced magnet mode in six of 16 (38%) devices. Magnet mode induction was successfully prevented in all cases by placing a 1 mm thin steel plate at the back of the smartphone. The Google Pixel did not induce magnet mode in any of the 16 devices, even with a magnetic case. Submuscular CIED placement resulted in no occurrence of magnet mode induction by any smartphone. All devices were still able to be interrogated and responded to a CIED magnet.
conclusionThe Apple iPhone induces magnet mode in close to half of subcutaneously placed CIED due to its MagSafe magnet. Neither a smartphone utilizing the Qi wireless charging standard nor magnetic smartphone cases confer the same risk. Submuscular CIED placement or magnetic shielding with a steel plate prevents magnet mode induction. The future Qi2.0 standard may exacerbate interaction risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.