ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Leveraging large language models for literature-driven prioritization of protein binding pockets.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurately identifying and prioritizing protein binding pockets is a foundational element of small-molecule drug discovery. Defining these known pockets currently relies on a laborious manual process of extracting key residue data from selected publications, reconciling inconsistent terminology, and independently computing volumetric representations. This manual curation to ensure biological relevance is time-consuming, error-prone, and represents a major bottleneck for efficient, high-throughput drug discovery.
resultsWe present a novel approach for the identification and prioritization of protein binding pockets for small molecules by combining geometric pocket detection with large language models (LLMs). Our method leverages Fpocket to generate candidate pockets, which are then validated against published experimental data extracted from research articles using LLM with a series of prompts fine-tuned to identify and extract residue-level information associated with experimentally confirmed binding sites. We developed a curated benchmark dataset of diverse proteins and associated literature to train and evaluate the LLM's performance in paper relevance assessment and pocket extraction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The developed benchmark dataset and methodology are freely available at the GitHub repository (https://github.com/receptor-ai/LLM-benchmark-dataset) and Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15798647).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.