ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025
Comparison of transcriptional activity profiling by metabolic labeling or nuclear RNA sequencing.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The application of high-throughput sequencing to cellular transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) has enabled significant advances in our understanding of gene expression in plants. However, conventional RNA-seq data reports mainly cytoplasmic transcript abundance rather than actual transcription rates. As a result, it is less sensitive to detect unstable and low-abundance nuclear RNA species, such as long non-coding RNAs, and is less directly connected to chromatin features and processes such as DNA replication. To bridge this gap, several protocols have been established to profile newly synthesized RNA in plants and other eukaryotes. These protocols can be technically challenging and present their own difficulties and limitations. Here we analyze newly synthesized nuclear RNA metabolically labeled in vivo with 5-ethynyl uridine (EU-nuclear RNA) in maize (Zea mays L.) root tips and compare it with the entire nuclear RNA population. We also compare both nuclear RNA preparations to conventional RNA-seq analysis of cellular RNA. The transcript abundance profiles of protein-coding genes in nuclear RNA and EU-nuclear RNA were tightly correlated with each other (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.