ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Multi-omics single-cell data alignment and integration with enhanced contrastive learning and differential attention mechanism.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topology-guided dual-masked contrastive learning for weakly supervised cell-type annotation in single-cell multi-omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Clonal Metamorphosis: Deconstructing MPN Evolution with Single-Cell and Spatial Multi-Omics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable deep learning approaches and clinical insights for cancer biomarker identification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIdentifying cell types that constitute complex tissue components using single-cell sequencing data is a critical issue in the field of biology. With the continuous advancement of sequencing technologies, the recognition of cell types has evolved from analyzing single-omics scRNA-seq data to integrating multi-omics single-cell data. However, existing methods for integrative analysis of high-dimensional multi-omics single-cell sequencing data have several limitations, including reliance on specific distribution assumptions of the data, sensitivity to noise, and clustering accuracy constrained by independent clustering methods. These issues have restricted improvements in the accuracy of cell type identification and hindered the application of such methods to large-scale datasets for cell type recognition. To address these challenges, we propose a novel method for aligning and integrating single-cell multi-omics data-scECDA.
resultsThe scECDA employs independently designed autoencoders that can autonomously learn the feature distributions of each omics dataset. By incorporating enhanced contrastive learning and differential attention mechanisms, the scECDA effectively reduces the interference of noise during data integration. The model design exhibits high flexibility, enabling adaptation to single-cell omics data generated by different technological platforms. It directly outputs integrated latent features and end-to-end cell clustering results. Through the analysis of the distribution of latent features, the scECDA can effectively identify key biological markers and precisely distinguish cell subtypes, recover cluster-specific motif and infer trajectory. The scECDA was applied to eight paired single-cell multi-omics datasets, covering data generated by 10X Multiome, CITE-seq, and TEA-seq technologies. Compared to eight state-of-the-art methods, scECDA demonstrated higher accuracy in cell clustering. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The scECDA code is freely available at https://github.com/SuperheroBetter/scECDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.