ReviewJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Current surgical treatment strategies and ongoing issues for locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Review in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short- and mid-term outcomes of transanal/transperineal minimally invasive surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) remains one of the most challenging problems in the rectal cancer management, despite advances in multimodal treatments. R0 resection remains the cornerstone of curative therapy and the most critical prognostic factor. However, achieving R0 resection is technically demanding, with outcomes heavily influenced by tumor location, institutional expertise, and careful patient selection. This narrative review summarizes current surgical strategies for LRRC, emphasizing the importance of accurate anatomical classification, multidisciplinary collaboration, and individualized planning. Extended resections-including bony pelvis, pelvic sidewall, and vascular dissections-have expanded surgical indications but require specialized expertise and carry risks of functional impairment. Minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic or robotic pelvic exenteration, may offer potential advantages in selected cases but remain technically challenging. Carbon ion radiotherapy, which demonstrates superior local control compared to conventional radiotherapy, is expected to be a promising treatment for unresectable LRRCs. Its future role as an alternative or perioperative treatment for resectable or borderline cases is under investigation. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may play an important role in radiation-naïve patients, while re-irradiation strategies remain controversial for previously irradiated cases. In patients with resectable distant metastases, aggressive combined surgical approaches may be pursued if curative resection is feasible. Ultimately, shared decision-making with patients is essential for optimal management of LRRC, based on a highly individualized, evidence-based approach that balances oncological prognosis and postoperative quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.