ArticleAnnals of surgery2026
Two-stage Hepatectomy Versus Liver Transplantation for Patients With Marginally Resectable Extensive Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver transplantation changes the rules for colorectal liver metastases.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of colorectal liver metastasis management: from resection to transplantation - a narrative review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare outcomes after two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) or liver transplantation (LT) in patients with extensive bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
backgroundGiven the high rate of intrahepatic recurrence after TSH in patients with resectable but extensive bilobar CRLM, LT may be an alternative option. However, studies comparing TSH for potentially resectable patients to LT for unresectable ones are lacking.
methodsWe compared oncological outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent TSH for extensive bilobar CRLM (resection group, n=32) without extrahepatic disease with those of all patients who underwent LT for unresectable liver-only CRLM (LT group, n=19) at a single center within the 2016 to 2023 period. Results were analysed both in intention to treat and in per protocol. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to refine the comparability of both groups.
resultsThe baseline and biological tumor characteristic of both groups were comparable except for unresectability and higher number of lesions in the LT group. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and time to surgical failure (TSF) in the LT group were all significantly better than those in the TSH group (5-year OS: 84% vs 32%, P =0.003, 5-year RFS: 24% vs 0%, P =0.0001, 5-year TSF: 61% vs 7.7%, P <0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that left primary sidedness [hazard ratio (HR): 0.38, P =0.049] and LT (HR: 0.20, P =0.01) were independent prognostic factors of favorable OS. These results were confirmed after PSM.
conclusionsOur results suggest that LT might achieve better outcomes than TSH in patients with extensive bilobar but resectable liver-only CRLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40795061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.