ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Prevalence and functional characterization of anti-interferon autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFunctional autoantibodies targeting IFNs can lead to immunodeficiency and have been implicated in various autoimmune diseases. Despite the critical role of interferons in myositis pathogenesis, the significance of anti-IFN autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and functional impact of anti-IFN autoantibodies in patients with myositis.
methodsSerum samples from 147 patients across two independent myositis cohorts were screened for autoantibodies against IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ω and IFN-γ. An independent validation cohort of 34 patients was also assessed for autoantibodies against type I IFN. Functional assays were performed to evaluate whether these autoantibodies inhibited type I IFN-induced signal transduction or protein expression.
resultsIncreased binding to IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ω and IFN-γ was detected in 3.9%, 5.5%, 2.8% and 0.7% of patients, respectively. Their prevalence did not significantly differ among myositis subtypes. Functional assays revealed no relevant inhibitory effects on type I IFN signalling.
conclusionsA subset of patients with inflammatory myopathies harbour low-level anti-IFN autoantibodies, but the absence of functional activity suggests that these autoantibodies are unlikely to directly contribute to disease pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.