ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
The Length of Haplotype Blocks and Signals of Structural Variation in Reconstructed Genealogies.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing the evolutionary histories of ultra-rare variants using variational dating of large ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Phantom epistasis through the lens of genealogies.Genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- A model-free method for genealogical inference without phasing and its application for topology weighting.Genetics · 2026Article
- Not Just Ne Ne-More: New Applications for SMC from Ecology to Phylogenies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Genomic perspectives on the inference of evolutionary changes in ecological life-history traits.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Review
- Accelerated Bayesian inference of population size history from recombining sequence data.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs have enabled the accurate inference of large-scale genealogies. Through modelling the impact of recombination on the correlation structure between genealogical local trees, we evaluate how this structure is reconstructed by leading approaches. Despite identifying pervasive biases, we show that applying a simple correction recovers the desired distributions for one algorithm, Relate. We develop a statistical test to identify clades spanning unexpectedly long genomic regions, likely reflecting regional suppression of recombination in some individuals. Our approach allows a systematic scan for inter-individual recombination rate variation at an intermediate scale, between genome-wide differences and individual hotspots. Using genealogies reconstructed with Relate for 2,504 human genomes, we identify 50 regions possessing clades with unexpectedly long genomic spans (P<1⋅10-12). The strongest signal corresponds to a known inversion on chromosome 17. The second strongest uncovers a novel 760-kb inversion on chromosome 10, common (21%) in S. Asians and correlated with GWAS hits for a range of phenotypes. Other regions indicate additional genomic rearrangements: inversions (8), copy number changes (2), or other variants (12). The remaining regions appear to reflect recombination suppression by previously unevidenced mechanisms. They are enriched for precisely spanning single genes (P=5⋅10-10), specifically those expressed in male gametogenesis, and for eQTLs (P=2⋅10-3). This suggests an extension of previously hypothesized crossover suppression within meiotic genes, towards a model of suppression varying across individuals with different expression levels. Our methods can be readily applied to other species, showing that genealogies offer previously untapped potential to study structural variation and other phenomena impacting evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.