ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Activation and sensitization of meningeal nociceptors by PACAP-38: implications for migraine headache.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Elucidating the nociceptive role of CGRP in migraine headache.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Peptidomics profiling identifies endogenous peptides associated with meningeal afferent activation in a chronic migraine mouse model.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- From bench to bedside: relevant animal models across the migraine attack phases.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Non-neuronal targets for migraine therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- The vessel-to-neuron trigeminovascular hypothesis of migraine pathogenesis - the 'pro' argument.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence implicates pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) in migraine and other headache disorders. Systemic infusion of PACAP-38 induces migraine headache in people with migraine and mild headache in healthy adults. However, the precise mechanism and site of action remain poorly characterized. To address this gap, we assessed whether PACAP-38 elicits headache by activating meningeal nociceptors. In vivo single-unit electrophysiological recordings were obtained from C- and Aδ-meningeal nociceptors in the trigeminal ganglion of anaesthetized male and female rats. Spontaneous firing rates and mechanical responses to dural indentation with von Frey filaments were recorded before and for 4 h after a 20-min intracarotid infusion of PACAP-38 (1 µg/ml/kg, 10 µg/ml/kg and 100 µg/ml/kg) or vehicle (isotonic saline). At the human-equivalent dose (10 µg/ml/kg), PACAP-38 activated 15 of 30 (50%) neurons, compared with none after vehicle (P < 0.01). Activation rates did not differ between C-fibres (7 of 17; 41%) and Aδ-fibres (8 of 13; 61.5%). The lowest dose of PACAP-38 (1 µg/ml/kg) activated 3 of 9 (33%) neurons, whereas the highest dose (100 µg/ml/kg) activated all four tested neurons, including two C-fibres and two Aδ-fibres. These results suggest that PACAP-38 induces headache through peripheral activation of meningeal nociceptors rather than exerting direct central effects within the spinal trigeminal nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.