ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with a Preferred Language Other than English in the Emergency Department.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on minority communities, including patients who identify as having a preferred language other than English (PLOE). Our primary goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with a PLOE in the emergency department (ED), and the use of interpreter services. Secondary outcomes evaluated were measures of patient care, including length of stay, number of studies performed, and unplanned return visits to the ED.
methodsWe performed an interrupted time series study of prospectively collected electronic health record (EHR) adult ED and language services data from an urban, safety-net hospital.
resultsThe total number of patients presenting to the ED went down in the early peak of the pandemic; however, the percentage of patients with a PLOE went up compared with previous years (19% vs 16%) and, despite making up only 19% of total patients, comprised 44% of total COVID-19 positive patients. In-person interpreter use decreased (prevalence ratio 0.49, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.43-0.56) while telephonic and video interpretation increased (prevalence ratio 3.97, 95% CI 3.56-4.43). Baseline testing was unchanged. All groups experienced a decrease in median LOS in 2020, but this was only found to be significant for patients who speak a language other than English or Spanish (P<0.001). None of the patient groups experienced a significant increase in unscheduled returns in 2020.
conclusionOur data confirms that COVID-19 disproportionately affected patients with a PLOE, with patients with a PLOE 2.9 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than their English-speaking counterparts. Efforts should be made to mitigate this effect via language-concordant care, professional interpreters, and culturally appropriate interaction and information dissemination, not only as it relates to planning for public health crises, but in the day-to-day function of the healthcare system at large. Continued research into the factors driving these inequities and ways to mitigate them is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.