Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794969›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025

Extended-release Injectable Buprenorphine Initiation in the Emergency Department.

Brittany Cesar, Jessica Moore, Raluca Isenberg, Jessica Heil, Rachel Rafeq, Rachel Haroz, Matthew Salzman, Alice V Ely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany CesarCooper University Health Care - Center for Healing, Department of Addiction Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Jessica MooreCooper University Health Care - Center for Healing, Department of Addiction Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Raluca IsenbergCooper University Health Care - Center for Healing, Department of Addiction Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Jessica HeilCooper University Health Care - Center for Healing, Department of Addiction Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Rachel RafeqCooper University Health Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Rachel HarozCooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Matthew SalzmanCooper University Health Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.
Alice V ElyCooper University Health Care - Center for Healing, Department of Addiction Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) is a long-acting injectable medication used for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). It is currently approved for use in patients who have been administered at least seven days of sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP). For patients with OUD who are unstable (ie, not at treatment goal, with active opioid use) or not yet on medication for OUD (MOUD) such as SL-BUP, the emergency department (ED) setting is an essential location for access to treatment. There is, as yet, no research on the utility of on-demand XR-BUP administration in the ED.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals with OUD who received XR-BUP in the ED through our novel reallocation pathway. We reviewed charts from an addiction medicine specialty outpatient clinic to determine retention in treatment, continuation on XR-BUP, and reported quantitative analysis. Our primary outcome was retention in treatment, measured by subsequent XR-BUP injection after initial ED XR-BUP administration. The secondary outcome was the reason for ED administration of XR-BUP (as opposed to administration in the clinic setting).

resultsOur study population included 69 patients (68.2% male). Our primary outcome showed that 51 (73.9%) patients who had their first injection in the ED received a second XR-BUP injection and 40 (58%) received their third XR-BUP injection. Our secondary outcome showed that 7.2% had barriers with access to treatment; however, most of the patients received the injection due to instability of the treatment of the OUD (69.6%). These patients were either unable to adhere to MOUD, reported issues with the prescription, or were still using substances while on MOUD. For 52 (75%) patients, the index ED injection was their first ever XR-BUP injection. Logistical regression analyses demonstrated that clinical and demographic factors did not lead to increased attrition, while patients with other co-occurring substance use disorders were more likely to present for follow-up treatment.

conclusionIn our retrospective study, patients who received ED-initiated extended-release buprenorphine had a strong retention rate compared to previous studies evaluating ED-initiated sublingual BUP (retention rates ranging from 16.7-60%). The ED provided a convenient healthcare access point for XR-BUP initiation. The XR-BUP is a helpful tool for achieving induction after failed SL-BUP initiation and may have further implications in minimizing treatment gaps after discharge and improving OUD treatment retention.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineEmergency Service, HospitalNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdministration, SublingualAdultDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBuprenorphineDelayed-Action PreparationsNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID40794969
PMCPMC12342416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.