ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Prediction of liquid-phase separation proteins using Siamese network with feature fusion.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a common and important phenomenon where biomolecules form dynamic, membrane-less condensates through multivalent interactions, spontaneously separating into distinct concentration-dense and dilute phases. Research has shown that LLPS is associated with a wide range of cellular functional regulation. In this work, we establish a feature fusion framework based on a Siamese network for the prediction of LLPS proteins, which can integrate automatically extracted features from the protein itself and the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and achieve good accuracy even in small sample sets. We used two representative graph embedding methods, Node2vec and DeepNF, to extract the embedding features of PPI networks and compared the impact of the two methods on model performance at different feature lengths. Our work provides a way for integrating multivalent interactions between proteins that drive LLPS, as well as a flexible framework for the fusion of different types of protein features, not only for LLPS prediction but also for other downstream prediction tasks. All relevant materials can be found at https://github.com/ispotato/SiameseNetwork_LLPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.