Trial reportAge and ageing2025
Feedback-based perturbation balance training during stationary cycling improves reactive and proactive balance among older adults: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03636672 (The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outdoor cycling competence and balance control in older adults - cross-sectional analysis of the BiPerAge trial.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- The Effect of Periodic Assessments and Verbal Feedback on Physical Function and Adherence in Healthy Adults Aged ≥65: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Effect of Rehabilitation Program for Muscle Strength, Balance, and Gait Retraining with Visual Feedback in Older Women with and Without Knee Osteoarthritis: Clinical Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerturbation balance training (PBT) is an effective regime that reduces fall rates by triggering and improving balance recovery skills. Controlling trunk movements consistently reflects effective reactive stepping, as it enhances proximal stability, providing a stable base for limb movements.
objectiveTo demonstrate the effect of PBT during seated hands-free stationery cycling on objective balance parameters of reactive and proactive balance control in standing.
designTwo-arm parallel-group, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and data analysers, with intention-to-treat analyses.
participantsFifty-six community-dwelling older adults, 70+ years of age (mean ± standard deviation: 76.43 ± 4.76 years, 39.3% of men and 60.7% of women), walking independently without assistive devices.
interventionsThe two groups performed twenty sessions of seated stationary cycling, 20 minutes each, over 12 weeks, while performing concurrent cognitive tasks: (i) cycling hands free, received perturbations with real-time implicit sensorimotor feedback (PBT during hands-free stationary cycling, n = 29); (ii) standard cycling training (SCT, n = 27) cycled using hands without perturbations. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the reactive balance measures in standing, e.g. single-step threshold, multiple-step threshold and the probability of stepping. Secondary outcomes were voluntary stepping Test and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Measures were taken at baseline and immediately postinterventions.
resultsThe group-by-time interactions indicate that PBT during hands-free stationary cycling improved balance reactive responses i.e. increased single- and multiple-step thresholds in mediolateral perturbations (P = .001, effect size [ES] = 0.88, and P = .001, ES = 0.64, respectively) and multiple-step threshold in anteroposterior perturbations (P = .022, ES = 0.34) and decreased the probability of stepping compared to standard cycling training. PBT during hands-free stationary cycling also resulted in faster voluntary step reaction (P = .011, ES = -0.84) and foot contact times (P = .037, ES = -0.56). Both groups significantly improved their 6MWT results.
conclusionFeedback-based PBT during hands-free stationary cycling has the potential to improve reactive and proactive balance measures in standing. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03636672, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03636672.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.