Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794879›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Improving therapeutic engagement and observations on inpatient mental health wards in the English National Health Service: lessons from using quality improvement to scale up interventions.

Marco Aurelio, Sasha Singh, Auzewell Chitewe, Claire Mckenna, Evah Marufu, David Bridle, Lorraine Sunduza, Amar Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco AurelioEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8419-4161
Sasha SinghEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.
Auzewell ChiteweNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom.
Claire MckennaEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.
Evah MarufuEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.
David BridleEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.
Lorraine SunduzaEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.
Amar ShahEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Robert Dolan House, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, United Kingdom.

Funding

Health Foundation, UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservations on mental health inpatient wards account for a large amount of staff time and cost to organisations. Ideally, observations should support meaningful engagement between staff and service users on wards, benefiting both the recovery of service users and the well-being of staff. However, observation practice is varied, and the therapeutic benefit it brings is questioned in some instances.

methodsOver 18 months, 55 inpatient mental health wards across one English National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust employed Quality Improvement (QI) methodology to test interventions aimed at improving observation completion and therapeutic engagement. A standard framework for scaling up was used to sequence the work and support moving from testing a large number of interventions locally to scaling three across the organisation. The three interventions were a board relay, zonal observations, and the use of life skills recovery workers to lead activities. Measures used included general and intermittent observation completion, incidents of violence and agression (physical, verbal and racial), restrictive practice (prone restraint, restraint, seclusion, and rapid tranquillisation), and staff sickness.

resultsSustained improvements were seen in all 10 measures used in this work, as evidenced by shifts in statistical process control charts. General observation completion increased by 1.2%, and intermittent observation completion rose by 1.9%. Incidents of physical violence were reduced by 23%, verbal aggression by 38% and racial aggression by 60. Restrictive practice use also reduced, with restraint reduced by 16%, prone restraint by 35%, seclusion by 38%, and rapid tranquillisation by 26%. Staff sickness also decreased by 16%.

conclusionObservation completion and therapeutic engagement have been shown to improve with zonal observations, a board relay, and life skills activities led by recovery workers. QI can be used to test and scale interventions rapidly across a system.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Department, HospitalQuality ImprovementEnglandHumansInpatientsState Medicinedelivery of healthcaremental healthpatient safetypsychiatryquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40794879
PMCPMC12380470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.