ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Maintenance suppression enhances subsequent associative learning.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maintenance suppression enhances subsequent associative learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Removing irrelevant information from working memory (WM) can free cognitive resources and reduce interference with current task goals. Beyond these immediate benefits, removal may also support long-term memory processes. We tested this hypothesis using an associative memory paradigm with directed forgetting instructions and characterized the underlying neural mechanisms. In complementary behavioral (N = 22) and fMRI (N = 17) experiments, participants completed an ABC associative memory task using pictures of objects, faces, and scenes. Each A item was sequentially paired with B and C items. Our key manipulation targeted the B items: following B encoding, participants were instructed either to maintain or suppress B. We hypothesized that suppression would impair AB memory but enhance AC memory, and this is precisely what we found. Suppression cues elicited distributed activations across frontoparietal control regions, as expected. Critically, multivoxel pattern analyses revealed enhanced encoding fidelity for C items in hippocampal subregion CA1 following suppression compared to maintenance. During subsequent associative memory tests cued by A items, reactivation of suppressed B items was significantly reduced relative to C items, reflecting diminished competition from B items during retrieval. Together, these findings demonstrate that suppression of unwanted information in WM benefits the formation of new memories by enhancing their encoding fidelity and biasing subsequent memory retrieval away from the suppressed associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.