ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild cognitive impairment: A network meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Effects of Dual and Single Task Exercises in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Acupuncture for chronic insomnia with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNon-pharmacological intervention represents a significant therapeutic modality for the cognitive function intervention management of patients with type 2 diabetes accompanied by mild cognitive impairment. However, it remains unclear which intervention measure is the most effective. The objective of this study is to compare and rank the influences of various non-pharmacological interventions on the cognitive function of patients with type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment.
methodsEight databases from the establishment of the database to November 2024 were retrieved. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the RoB2.0 tool. Paired Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata/SE 15.1 software, and Network Meta-analysis was performed using R 4.3.1 software.
resultsA total of 25 literatures were incorporated, encompassing 5 intervention measures, with a sample size of 2,446 cases. The results indicated that in the pairwise meta-analysis, when the MoCA score was used as the outcome indicator, cognitive training [MD = 2.3, 95% CI (1.64, 2.96), P < 0.01], exercise therapy [MD = 2.11, 95% CI (1.30, 2.92), P < 0.01], TCM therapy [MD = 2.28, 95% CI (0.76, 3.81), P < 0.01], and comprehensive intervention [MD = 1.98, 95% CI (1.53, 2.48), P < 0.01] were more effective in improving the cognitive status of patients than the control group; when the MMSE was used as the outcome indicator, cognitive training [MD = 2.03 95% CI (1.57, 2.49), P < 0.01], exercise therapy [MD = 2.78, 95% CI (1.48, 4.08), P < 0.01], and TCM therapy [MD = 2.09, 95% CI (1.46, 2.73), P < 0.01] were more effective in improving the cognitive status of patients than the control group. The SUCRA ranking revealed that in terms of improving the MoCA scores, the comprehensive intervention (SUCRA 76.9%), cognitive training (SUCRA 63.3%), and TCM therapy (SUCRA 57.9%) were the top 3 preferred treatment measures; for improving the MMSE scores, exercise therapy (SUCRA 78.0%) and cognitive training (SUCRA 73.8%) were the preferred treatment measures.
conclusionThe current evidence indicates that cognitive training, exercise therapy, and TCM therapy might be relatively effective intervention approaches for improving the cognitive function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accompanied by mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitive training could potentially be the most efficacious non-pharmacological treatment method. Constrained by the quantity and quality of the studies, more high-quality research is still required in the future to further validate this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.