ArticleGenetics2025
Neutral genetic diversity during selective sweeps in nonrecombining populations.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective sweeps, resulting from the spread of beneficial, neutral, or deleterious mutations through a population, shape patterns of genetic variation at linked neutral sites. While many theoretical, computational, and statistical advances have been made in understanding the genomic signatures of selective sweeps in recombining populations, relatively less is understood in populations with little/no recombination, and arbitrary dominance and inbreeding. Using diffusion theory, we obtain the full expression for the expected site frequency spectrum (SFS) at linked neutral sites immediately post and during the fixation of moderately or strongly beneficial mutations. When a single hard sweep occurs, the SFS decays as 1/x for low derived allele frequencies (x), similar to the neutral SFS at equilibrium, whereas at higher derived allele frequencies, it follows a 1/x2 power law as also seen in a rapidly expanding neutral population. We show that these power laws are universal in the sense that they are independent of the dominance and inbreeding coefficients, and also characterize the SFS during the sweep. Additionally, we find that the derived allele frequency where the SFS shifts from the 1/x to 1/x2 power law is inversely proportional to the selection strength; thus under strong selection, the SFS follows the 1/x2 dependence for most allele frequencies. When clonal interference is pervasive, the SFS immediately post-fixation becomes U-shaped and can be approximated by the equilibrium SFS of selected sites. Our results will be important in developing statistical methods to infer the timing and strength of recent selective sweeps in asexual populations, genomic regions that lack recombination, and clonally propagating tumor populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.