ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Impact of Natural Transformation on the Acquisition of Novel Genes in Bacteria.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acquisition and erosion of toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A WYL transcriptional regulator activates the DNA damage response pathway in Acinetobacter species.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Genetic Adaptation of Mesorhizobium Symbionts Associated With Caragana in Northern China Deserts.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization of a pathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Plasmids serve as vehicles and reservoirs of type VI secretion systems.ISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural transformation is the only process of gene exchange under the exclusive control of the recipient bacteria. It has often been considered as a source of novel genes, but quantitative assessments of this claim are lacking. To investigate the potential role of natural transformation in gene acquisition, we analyzed a large collection of genomes of Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) and Legionella pneumophila (Lp) for which transformation rates were experimentally determined. Natural transformation rates are weakly correlated with genome size. But they are negatively associated with gene turnover in both species. This might result from a negative balance between the transformation's ability to cure the chromosome from mobile genetic elements (MGEs), resulting in gene loss, and its facilitation of gene acquisition. By comparing gene gains by transformation and MGEs, we found that transformation was associated with the acquisition of small sets of genes per event, which were also spread more evenly in the chromosome. We estimated the contribution of natural transformation to gene gains by comparing recombination-driven gene acquisition rates between transformable and non-transformable strains, finding that it facilitated the acquisition of ca. 6.4% (Ab) and 1.1% (Lp) of the novel genes. This moderate contribution of natural transformation to gene acquisition implies that most novel genes are acquired by other means. Yet, 15% of the recently acquired antibiotic resistance genes in A. baumannii may have been acquired by transformation. Hence, natural transformation may drive the acquisition of relatively few novel genes, but these may have a high fitness impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.