Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794727›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Putting behaviors into context for vector-borne diseases: Examining behaviors that may reduce exposure to disease vectors.

Raissa Nogueira de Brito, Susan Tanner, Julie Velásquez Runk, Nicole L Gottdenker, Adelys Reina, Ayesha Rodríguez, Chystrie Rigg, Daniel Mendieta, John P Schmidt, Juliana Hoyos and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Raissa Nogueira de BritoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-8139
Susan TannerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Julie Velásquez RunkEnvironment and Sustainability Studies Program, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nicole L GottdenkerDepartment of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Adelys ReinaDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Ayesha RodríguezDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Chystrie RiggDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Daniel MendietaDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
John P SchmidtOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Juliana HoyosOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Kadir GonzálezDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Kimberly ArchboldDepartment of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Richard J HallDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Tania GómezFacultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación y Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Parasitarias (CIDEP), Universidad de Panamá, Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Vanessa PinedaDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Vanessa VásquezDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Jose E CalzadaDepartamento de Investigación en Parasitología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud (ICGES), Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Azael SaldañaFacultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación y Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Parasitarias (CIDEP), Universidad de Panamá, Panama City, Republic of Panama.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) CNH2-1924200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding why people adopt or ignore vector-borne disease (VBD) preventive measures is key to better risk assessment and control. However, little is known about why some households adopt preventive practices while others do not, which is particularly striking in this era of One Health's attention to human, environmental, and animal health. We examined what household factors are linked to practices that may reduce exposure to disease vectors, with a focus on Chagas disease (CD) and American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) vectors. We surveyed 204 households in 12 rural communities in Coclé Province, Republic of Panama, between March 2022 and December 2023. We used logistic regression models to explore the association between household contextual elements, such as respondents' sex, wealth (consumer goods and agricultural), knowledge about ACL and CD, feelings about insects, and perceptions of control over health outcomes, and personal (use of repellents, and hand protection before touching a CD vector) and property-based behaviors (use of insecticides in the house, use of windows/doors screens, and cleaning peridomestic debris) that may reduce exposure to disease vectors. We found mixed associations between protective behaviors and the contextual household elements. Participants who reported feeling bothered by insects were more likely to use repellents (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.97 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI]: 1.47-6.20), whereas those who reported being in control of their health were less likely to use protection before touching a CD vector (OR = 0.8, CI: 0.67-0.95). Window/door screens were associated with more household consumer goods wealth (OR: 1.44; CI: 1.23-1.71), while households with a history of ACL cases were more likely to have peridomestic debris accumulation (OR: 2.33; CI: 1.17-4.75). Additionally, householders bothered by insects were less likely to have peridomestic debris (OR: 0.42; CI: 0.20-0.84), as well as those who believe health outcomes happen by chance (OR: 0.89; CI: 0.82-0.98). Our findings emphasize the importance of considering a more comprehensive household background and attention to cultural values to foster context-sensitive strategies for vector-borne pathogen prevention and control.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInsect VectorsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousVector Borne DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPanamaRural Population

Identifiers

PMID40794727
PMCPMC12342304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.