Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794688›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Beyond the leaderboard: leveraging predictive modeling for protein-ligand insights and discovery.

Dan Kalifa, Kira Radinsky, Eric Horvitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan KalifaDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-6833
Kira RadinskyDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
Eric HorvitzOffice of the Chief Scientific Officer, Microsoft, Redmond, WA 14820, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-0614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLigands are biomolecules that bind to specific sites on target proteins, often inducing conformational changes important in the protein's function. Knowledge about ligand interactions with proteins are fundamental to understanding biological mechanisms and advancing drug discovery. Traditional protein language models focus on amino acid sequences and 3D structures, overlooking the structural and functional changes induced by protein-ligand interactions. We investigate the value of integrating ligand-protein binding data in several predictive challenges and leverage findings to frame research directions and questions.

resultsWe show how the integration of protein-ligand interaction data in protein representation learning can increase predictive power. We evaluate the methodology across diverse biological tasks, demonstrating consistent improvements over state-of-the-art models. We further demonstrate how the study of the specific boosts in predictive capabilities coming with the introduction of the ligand modality can serve to focus attention and provide insights on biological mechanisms. By leveraging large pretrained protein language models and enriching them with interaction-specific features through a tailored learning process, we capture functional and structural nuances of proteins in their biochemical context. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The full code and data are freely available at https://github.com/kalifadan/ProtLigand (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15808053).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsDrug DiscoveryLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40794688
PMCPMC12342388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.