ArticlePloS one2025
Quality of postnatal care for mothers and neonates in Mexico: Insights from the maternal eCohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to evaluate healthcare use during the postnatal period for mothers and their babies, the content of care received, mothers' perceived quality of care, and the factors influencing these perceptions.
methodsThe study analyzed data from a postnatal survey conducted within the maternal eCohort at the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). The research involved 973 women aged 18-49 who were recruited following their first antenatal care visit with a family physician at 48 family medicine clinics across eight Mexican states. We described postnatal care (PNC) use, content of care and perceived quality and used Poisson multivariable regression analysis to investigate the factors influencing women's perceptions of higher quality of care during PNC.
results29.4% of women and 12.0% of infants had no postnatal care visits within the six weeks following hospital discharge. Among women who received PNC, 72.3% accessed services exclusively through IMSS, 17.7% utilized a combination of IMSS and other providers, and 10% relied solely on private providers. Infants received 82.4% of recommended content of care, compared to 66.7% for mothers. The median perceived quality of care among women was 25 points on a scale of 8-40. Key areas for improvement include enhancing awareness of the importance of postnatal consultations among health personnel and women, reducing waiting times, and improving the content and length of consultations. Factors associated with better perceived quality included being over 35, receiving better content of care for infants, and being treated by private providers, while lower education levels, prior pregnancies, and poor health were associated with lower perceived quality.
conclusionImprovements are needed to ensure all women and infants receive comprehensive postnatal care and to enhance patient-perceived quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.