ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluating the use of SPIRIT on participant retention in randomised trials: Challenges in reporting and implications for practice.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish whether the use of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) item 18b (retention), evidence of planning for retention, has any effect on participant retention rates in randomised controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingA retrospective study of randomised controlled trials between 2014 and 2019. We reviewed 506 trial protocols, 253 protocols that stated the use of SPIRIT guidelines in the protocol, and 253 protocols that did not.
resultsThe reported use of SPIRIT guideline item 18b in the trial protocol has no significant effect on participant retention rates in the corresponding trials. It does not impact the overall retention rate of participants throughout the trial, nor the retention rate of the primary outcome measure.
conclusionSPIRIT item 18b appeared not to contribute to improved participant retention rates in randomised trials. However, the lack of high-certainty evidence for effectiveness of the intervention strategies cited likely impacts this finding. Additionally, inconsistent reporting of retention strategies in trial protocols is evident and needs to be more complete to facilitate evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.