Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparative study of pavement anomaly detection using detection models with rotated bounding boxes.

Shunli Ji, Fusheng Niu, Yazhou Qin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shunli JiDepartment of Ship and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Shipping College, Nantong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1366-191X
Fusheng NiuChina Railway Tunnel Group Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Yazhou QinSchool of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative study on automated pavement anomaly detection is conducted to improve the detection accuracy of models based on You Only Look Once version 4-Tiny (YOLOv4-Tiny). This study is the first to introduce a rotated rectangle labeling strategy for pavement anomaly detection. The pavement image dataset, primarily collected in Nantong, China, includes 1,107 cracks and 691 potholes. First, the YOLOv4-Tiny model is trained and validated as a baseline, achieving a mean average precision (mAP) below 0.4, which is inadequate for practical use. To improve performance, the YOLOv4-ResNet50 model is proposed by replacing the original backbone with a ResNet50 network, resulting in modest gains. To further enhance precision, rotated rectangles-bounding boxes that include an additional rotation angle-are used instead of conventional axis-aligned boxes. Accordingly, the YOLOv4-Tiny-rotated and YOLOv4-ResNet50-rotated models are developed and evaluated on the same dataset. Results show that the YOLOv4-ResNet50-rotated model achieves an mAP of 0.742, outperforming the more advanced YOLOX model, which reaches an mAP of 0.627. Moreover, the rotated bounding boxes enable more accurate representation of the shape and orientation of inclined cracks, making this model particularly well-suited for pavement anomaly detection. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of rotated rectangle labeling and rotated predicted bounding boxes in detecting inclined cracks and potholes, laying a foundation for further research in this area.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, TheoreticalAlgorithmsChina

Identifiers

PMID40794644
PMCPMC12342265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.