ArticlePloS one2025
Caring for home care workers: Health and safety hazards, harms and risk factors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antecedents of well-being of home care workers: a mixed-methods systematic review.The Gerontologist · 2026Pooled it
- Will 'Support at Home' Deliver What Older People Want?Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home care workers support the growing number of older adults or people with disabilities who are living at home in their own private residences. The complex and varied work health and safety (WHS) hazards these workers face on the job include both physical and psychosocial harms. While physical WHS hazards in this sector have been articulated, there is an urgent need to update, understand and address psychosocial risks such as verbal abuse and sexually inappropriate behaviour and bullying, particularly when perpetrated by clients. This study sought to identify the range of WHS hazards and harms that home care workers face and the risk factors that mitigate or exacerbate them. Interviews with 70 stakeholders including local Australian (n = 18) and migrant (n = 17) workers and organisational providers were analyzed thematically using a hybrid of deductive and inductive coding. Common and severe hazards reported included abuse and aggression, demanding workloads, unsuitable and dynamic workspaces, manual labour, challenging client behaviours and difficulty maintaining clear professional boundaries. Few differences were identified between aged and disability sectors, or between standard and online providers. Key recommendations include improved sharing of relevant client information, addressing rather than ignoring worker isolation, promoting appropriate self-care and developing skills in dynamic risk assessment. These findings call for sector-wide reforms that integrate best practices, enhance worker support, and redefine organisational priorities to improve both worker safety and the quality of care provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.