Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Development, feasibility, and acceptability of a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of minority stress and suicidal ideation among sexual and gender minority youth.

Kirsty Clark, Kaitlyn Phillips, Elisa Park, Alexandra Argiros, Alexandros Nikolaidis-Konstas, Joseph Sexton, Melissa Cyperski, Evan Kleiman, John Pachankis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Understanding sleep and smartphone use in diverse adolescents through passive digital monitoring.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirsty ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-8460
Kaitlyn PhillipsDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Elisa ParkDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5704-1645
Alexandra ArgirosDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-7286
Alexandros Nikolaidis-KonstasDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Joseph SextonDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Melissa CyperskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-3344
Evan KleimanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
John PachankisDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

Predicting and Preventing Suicidal Ideation among High-Risk Sexual and Gender Minority AdolescentsK01MH125073 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, KIRSTY A · 2021 to 2024
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH125073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of minority stress and suicidal ideation intensity among sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) in the US Southeast.

methodsIn Study 1, the EMA protocol was developed through an iterative process, incorporating qualitative input from focus groups and interviews with 16 parents of SGMY and 16 SGMY from the US Southeast as well as six clinicians and researchers. In Study 2, 50 SGMY aged 13-24 with past-year suicidal ideation and current depressive symptoms were recruited from the US Southeast. The study included a baseline assessment, 28 consecutive days of EMA surveys (3x per day), a weekly acceptability survey, and a post-study exit interview.

resultsIn Study 1, qualitative feedback guided the selection, adaptation, and development of EMA measures and informed study features including the EMA schedule, reminder notifications, incentive structure, and the safety and risk monitoring protocol. In Study 2, the EMA protocol demonstrated feasibility through high compliance with the EMA survey (M = 80.21%, SD = 16.92%, Mdn = 83.93%, range = 38.10%-100.00%) with some variation over time and by participant age. Weekly feedback surveys indicated high acceptability, with participants reporting that the EMA surveys were easy to complete and private, understandable, minimally burdensome, and at least moderately engaging. Exit interviews revealed several themes, including facilitators of high engagement, barriers to engagement, intervention implications, and suggested improvements for future EMA studies.

conclusionsSmartphone-based EMA is a feasible and acceptable method for studying real-time experiences of minority stress and suicidal ideation intensity among SGMY at high risk. Incorporating community member feedback during EMA study development can help to ensure cultural responsiveness and enhance participant compliance. This paper provides practical guidance for researchers planning to conduct EMA suicide research with SGMY.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentSexual and Gender MinoritiesSmartphoneStress, PsychologicalSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40794631
PMCPMC12342249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.