Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794618›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2025

Ageing versus developmental silencing: Answers from the epigenome.

Kirsten C Sadler, Mekayla A Storer, N Sumru Bayin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten C SadlerProgram in Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, NYU Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-4125
Mekayla A StorerCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
N Sumru BayinDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, UK.

Funding

Role of Uhrf1 in Liver Development, Regeneration and CarciogenesisR01DK080789 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Kirsten C Sadler Edepli · 2009 to 2026
$5.2M
Cambridge Stem Cell Institute Seed FundingCancer Research UK C6946/A24843Career Development Award from the Wellcome Trust 227294/Z/23/Z)Career Development Award from the Wellcome Trust G117552National Institute of Health - National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 5R01DK080789-12NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080789NYUAD Center for Genomics and Systems Biology CGS13NYUAD Division of Science SEEDG-AD188Royal Society RGS\R1\231143Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A strong regenerative capacity is a hallmark of youth. From the tadpole's tail to the mammalian brain, young animals of many species can repair or regrow damaged tissues more effectively than older animals. Here, we take a broad perspective on ageing, inclusive of the transition from the developmental processes of embryogenesis through maturation to adulthood, as well as the processes that occur as an animal reaches the end of its lifespan. In some cases, the loss of regenerative capacity occurs once development is complete, and in others it occurs in the latter part of the animal's life. Regardless, the loss of regenerative capacity is caused by a failure to activate genes required for successful regeneration. This, in part, can be attributed to restructuring of the epigenome.

Indexed as

AgingEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeRegenerationAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansageingdevelopmentepigeneticsepigenomicsregeneration

Identifiers

PMID40794618
PMCPMC12524974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.