Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794593›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

A Sitewise Model of Natural Selection on Individual Antibodies via a Transformer-Encoder.

Frederick A Matsen, Kevin Sung, Mackenzie M Johnson, Will Dumm, David Rich, Tyler N Starr, Yun S Song, Philip Bradley, Julia Fukuyama, Hugh K Haddox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Separating selection from mutation in antibody language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederick A MatsenComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-6025
Kevin SungComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-845X
Mackenzie M JohnsonComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-2023
Will DummComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8617-476X
David RichComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2501-4032
Tyler N StarrDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6713-6904
Yun S SongComputer Science Division and Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0734-9868
Philip BradleyComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0224-6464
Julia FukuyamaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-5563
Hugh K HaddoxComputational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-8324

Funding

DECODING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN T CELL RECEPTORS AND PEPTIDE-MHCR01AI136514 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Paul G. Thomas · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Blending deep learning with probabilistic mechanistic models to predict and understand the evolution and function of adaptive immune receptorsR01AI146028 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MATSEN, FREDERICK ALBERT · 2019 to 2024
$3.4M
Molecular modeling and machine learning for protein structures and interactionsR35GM141457 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRADLEY, PHILIP · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
High-Performance Compute Cluster for Comprehensive Cancer and Infectious Diseases ResearchS10OD028685 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRADLEY, PHILIP · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
The evolutionary landscape of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody developmentDP2AI177890 · NIAID · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Tyler Nelson Starr · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
Scalable Computational Methods for Genealogical Inference: from species level to single cellsR01HG013117 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Ian H Holmes, RASMUS NIELSEN · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Scalable Computational Methods for Genealogical Inference: from species level to single cellsR56HG013117 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HOLMES, IAN H, NIELSEN, RASMUS · 2023 to 2023
$315k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG013117NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG013117NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI177890NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136514NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146028NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141457NIH HHS DP2-AI177890NIH HHS R01-AI136514NIH HHS R01-AI146028NIH HHS R01-HG013117NIH HHS R35-GM141457NIH HHS R56-HG013117NIH HHS S10 OD028685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During affinity maturation, antibodies are selected for their ability to fold and to bind a target antigen between rounds of somatic hypermutation. Previous studies have identified patterns of selection in antibodies using B cell repertoire sequencing data. However, these studies are constrained by needing to group many sequences or sites to make aggregate predictions. In this paper, we develop a transformer-encoder selection model of maximum resolution: given a single antibody sequence, it predicts the strength of selection on each amino acid site. Specifically, the model predicts for each site whether evolution will be slower than expected relative to a model of the neutral mutation process (purifying selection) or faster than expected (diversifying selection). We show that the model does an excellent job of modeling the process of natural selection on held out data, and does not need to be enormous or trained on vast amounts of data to perform well. The patterns of purifying vs diversifying natural selection do not neatly partition into the complementarity-determining vs framework regions: for example, there are many sites in framework that experience strong diversifying selection. There is a weak correlation between selection factors and solvent accessibility. When considering evolutionary shifts down a tree of antibody evolution, affinity maturation generally shifts sites towards purifying natural selection, however this effect depends on the region, with the biggest shifts toward purifying selection happening in the third complementarity-determining region. We observe distinct evolution between gene families but a limited relationship between germline diversity and selection strength.

Indexed as

AntibodiesModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAntibody AffinityComplementarity Determining RegionsEvolution, MolecularHumansAntibodiesComplementarity Determining Regionsaffinity maturationantibodyB cell receptornatural selectiontransformer architecture

Identifiers

PMID40794593
PMCPMC12375951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.