Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794536›Full record

ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2025

PGT-A in POSEIDON Patients - perspectives and limitations.

Jakub Wyroba, Maria Barszcz, Iwona Fajt, Joanna Kochan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakub WyrobaMalopolski Institute of Fertility Diagnostics and Treatment - KrakOvi, Krakow, Poland.
Maria BarszczMalopolski Institute of Fertility Diagnostics and Treatment - KrakOvi, Krakow, Poland.
Iwona FajtMalopolski Institute of Fertility Diagnostics and Treatment - KrakOvi, Krakow, Poland.
Joanna KochanMalopolski Institute of Fertility Diagnostics and Treatment - KrakOvi, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the likelihood of being able to perform PGT-A, and its results, in each POSEIDON group compared to their age-matched non-POSEIDON group.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 4 groups of POSEIDON patients (n=824) who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) The controls were non-POSEIDON patients in two age groups (<35 and ≥35 years old; n=360).

resultsThe non-POSEIDON <35Y group had the highest number of embryos at the blastocyst stage that could be used for PGT-A (5.1±2/cycle), and the POSEIDON IV group had the fewest (0.6±0.3/cycle). Significantly fewer blastocysts were PGT-A tested in the groups with no indications for PGT-A (i.e. POSEIDON I (26%) and III (28%) and non-POSEIDON <35Y (39%)), compared to the groups with indications (i.e. POSEIDON II (69%), and IV (67%) and non POSEIDON ≥35Y (72%)). The euploidy rate was similar between groups without PGT-A indications (59%-64%) and between groups with indications (35-41%), but was significantly lower in groups with indications (p<0.001).

conclusionsPOSEIDON patients are as willing to undergo PGT-A testing as non-POSEIDON patients, despite the poor prognosis. However, the final PGT-A result is very low compared to that in non-POSEIDON patients of the same age. Failure is usually caused by the inability to perform the blastocyst biopsy due to a lack of oocytes or blastocyst-stage embryos, and to a low rate of euploidy in groups ≥35Y.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAdultFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicICSIPGT-APOSEIDON

Identifiers

PMID40794536
PMCPMC12694973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.