ArticleJMIR aging2025
Staff Enablement of the Tovertafel for Enrichment in Residential Aged Care: Field Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Caring over computing: an ethical and sociotechnical perspective on digital technologies for social connectedness in dementia care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnrichment activities are essential for enhancing the psychosocial well-being of older adults living in residential aged care homes. There has been increasing interest in using digital technology for enrichment, but the implementation of technology requires careful support and enablement from staff to ensure that residents experience the intended benefits.
objectiveThis study aimed to understand how care staff facilitate aged care residents' use of the Tovertafel ("magic table" in Dutch), a technology that projects images onto a tabletop to enable groups of people to play games. The study further aimed to understand the benefits arising from the Tovertafel when facilitated by staff.
methodsWe conducted a field study in 1 residential aged care home in Queensland, Australia. The methods included semistructured interviews with the staff and residents about their experiences with the Tovertafel, observations of 4 sessions in which the residents and staff played Tovertafel games, and a diary completed by the staff after Tovertafel sessions. Data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsWe developed 3 themes through our analysis. Theme 1 highlights the need for the staff to overcome physical and personal barriers before Tovertafel sessions could take place. These included a lack of a dedicated space for playing Tovertafel games and the residents' reluctance to attend Tovertafel sessions. Theme 2 highlights how the staff used creative strategies to make Tovertafel sessions successful. These included helping the residents learn how to interact with the games; adapting the activity to suit the capabilities of the residents; sustaining engagement by choosing appropriate games; and using prompts, questions, and storytelling to make the games more engaging. Theme 3 describes the benefits and outcomes that arose from staff-supported enablement of the Tovertafel, including participation in an enjoyable physical activity, socialization, and reminiscence.
conclusionsThis study suggests that the Tovertafel provides opportunities for aged care staff to engage in creative play and personalization catering to residents with different capabilities. However, the benefits arising from the Tovertafel are unlikely to be achieved without substantial facilitation from the staff, who play a key role in enabling the participation of the residents. Sustaining the engagement of the residents is important during Tovertafel activities and can lead to beneficial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.