Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794410›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Work Impairment and Financial Outcomes Among Adults With vs Without Long COVID.

Michael Gottlieb, Ji Chen, Huihui Yu, Michelle Santangelo, Erica S Spatz, Nicole L Gentile, Rachel E Geyer, Caitlin Malicki, Kristyn Gatling, Kelli N O'Laughlin and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Ji ChenSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Huihui YuSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michelle SantangeloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Erica S SpatzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nicole L GentileDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rachel E GeyerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Caitlin MalickiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kristyn GatlingDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Kelli N O'LaughlinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kari A StephensDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Joann G ElmoreDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lauren E WiskDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.
Michelle L'HommedieuDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.
Robert RodriguezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Juan Carlos C MontoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Ralph C WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Kristin L RisingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Efrat KeanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jonathan W DyalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mandy J HillDepartment of Population Health and Health Disparities, School of Public and Population Health at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston.
Arjun K VenkateshDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Robert A WeinsteinRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
INSPIRE Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While much of the focus on long COVID (LC; defined as developing new, persistent symptoms lasting 3 months or longer after SARS-CoV-2 infection) has been on health status and quality of life, the impact on individual work productivity and financial distress are less well established. Objectives: To assess differences in work and financial outcomes among individuals with current, resolved, and no LC up to 3 years after initial infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multisite, longitudinal cohort study enrolled adult participants (age ≥18 years) with at least 1 reported SARS-CoV-2 infection from December 7, 2020, to August 29, 2022. Follow-up electronic surveys were collected through April 2, 2024. Data were analyzed from January 20 to February 4, 2025. Exposure: Self-reported resolved or current LC and vaccination status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Financial toxicity was measured using Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-COST), and work impact was measured using the Work Productivity & Activity Impairment questionnaire (version 2.0). Results: Of 3663 participants (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [14.2] years; 2429 [66.3%] female), 994 (27.1%) reported current LC, 2604 (71.1%) never had LC, and 65 (1.8%) had resolved LC. Participants with current LC reported more overall work impairment due to health (mean [SD], 17.7% [25.3%] of total hours worked per week) compared with those who never had LC (mean [SD], 3.2% [11.8%] of total hours) and resolved LC (mean [SD], 5.6% [12.2%] of total hours), with significantly increased odds of any work impairment compared with those who never had LC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.24; 95% CI, 5.68-9.21). The current LC group had increased odds of missing work due to their health (aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.93-3.57) and of experiencing work impairment (aOR, 11.82; 95% CI, 8.90-15.70) compared with the group who never had LC. Individuals with current LC had increased odds of having moderate to high FACIT-COST scores compared with those who never had LC (aOR, 5.20; 95% CI, 3.92-6.89) and compared with those with resolved LC (aOR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.19-8.41). Participants who were vaccinated had lower overall work impairment (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92), impairment while working (aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87), impairment of nonwork activities (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.96), and financial toxicity (least-squares mean difference, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.19-1.95) compared with those who were not vaccinated. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study of adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection, participants with current self-reported LC reported worse work impairment, missed work, and financial distress compared with those who never had LC, while vaccination was associated with improved work outcomes and less financial distress even among individuals with LC. These data underscore the need for postpandemic assistance programs, as well as vaccination to decrease societal harms.

Indexed as

COVID-19Financial StressAdultEfficiencyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40794410
PMCPMC12344534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.