ArticleJAMA network open2025
Cervical Cancer Screening, HPV Vaccination, and Cervical Cancer Elimination.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of Post-Treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT for Detecting Recurrent Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Review
- Observational
- Improving and sustaining adolescent access to primary care in a socioeconomically vulnerable urban community in Brazil: outcomes of a quality improvement initiative.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer Epidemiology: Global Incidence, Mortality, Survival, Risk Factors, and Equity in HPV Screening and Vaccination.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- HPV Vaccine Uptake and Cervical Cancer Trends in Panama: A Reference Point for Future Impact Studies.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Review
- Trends in the Incidence of Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers in Canada and the Netherlands.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: To accelerate cervical cancer elimination, it is essential to evaluate the combined impact of ongoing screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination efforts, as the disease remains a significant global public health concern. Objective: To estimate how different cervical cancer screening strategies, along with HPV vaccination, affect the cervical cancer burden in South Korea. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model used a deterministic age-structured dynamic model to simulate HPV transmission and cervical cancer progression, considering sexual behavior and population structure, for the Korean population from 2024 to 2100. The study was conducted from April 2023 to September 2024. Exposures: Cervical cancer screening using Papanicolaou (Pap) or HPV testing, with HPV vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The cumulative number of incident cases of cervical cancer and deaths for the projected period are reported. Results: The study modeled more than 51 million Korean residents, with 25.88 million women (50.1%) and 10.05 million women aged 18 to 49 years. Among Pap test-based strategies, biennial screening for women aged 20 years and older was associated with the lowest number of cervical cancer cases (47 358) and deaths (34 242) by 2100, with as much as a 10% mortality reduction compared with other Pap test-based strategies. High-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing every 2 or 3 years was estimated to further reduce cases by as much as 27% and deaths by 13%. Depending on the screening strategy, cervical cancer elimination based on the World Health Organization definition (4 cases per 100 000 women) could occur as early as 2038 (with 2-year hrHPV testing starting at age 25 years or older) or as late as 2055 (5-year Pap testing for individuals aged 25 to 64 years). The current screening policy (Pap test every 2 years starting at age 20 years) was estimated to reach disease elimination by 2044. In an ideal scenario with 70% screening and 90% vaccination coverage from 2030, an additional 12% of cases and 7% of deaths could be prevented. Strategies using a 2-year interval for hrHPV testing could lead to the earliest cervical cancer elimination by 2034. Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision analytical model, an ideal scenario with higher cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination rates was associated with substantially reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality and accelerated elimination in South Korea. Notably, hrHPV testing with 2- or 3-year screening intervals was estimated to achieve elimination as early as 2034.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.