ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Interferences between time and space in advanced age.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Space-time interference in action.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026Article
- Age and Physical Activity Modulate the Spatial Mapping of Time-Related Words.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual interference between time and space has been reported in neonates, infants, children, and young adults, but to date it is unknown how space-time interference develops in advanced age. The presented study aims to bridge this gap by testing these interference effects in older (60 + years) and younger (18-35 years) participants. We asked our participants to reproduce the temporal duration or the spatial size of realistic three-dimensional (3D) stimuli (virtual rooms of different size presented in immersive virtual reality (VR)) and of abstract two-dimensional (2D) stimuli (squares presented on a PC screen). The results show that space judgments of older versus younger adults are more affected by irrelevant temporal information (time-on-space effect), whereas the reverse space-on-time effect was not significantly different between age groups. Space-time interference did not differ between 3D and 2D task versions. Together, our findings provide first insights into the development of space-time interference in advanced age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.