Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794356›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Dyadic Interventions for LGBTQ+ Individuals Facing Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Milena E Insalaco, Viktor Clark, Jeffrey Ramos-Santiago, Zeinab A Mohamed, Hala Awad, Megan A Mullins, Lelaina G Nagle, Charles Kamen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milena E InsalacoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Milena_Insalaco@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Viktor ClarkSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jeffrey Ramos-SantiagoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Zeinab A MohamedSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Hala AwadSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Megan A MullinsPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, Department of Health Economics, Systems, and Policy, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lelaina G NagleSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Charles KamenSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementDyadic interventions are uniquely positioned not only to improve psychosocial outcomes for those with cancer, but also to improve caregiver and relationship outcomes. Although dyadic interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing distress and improving quality of life among individuals with cancer and caregivers in the general population, their applicability to minoritized populations, such as LGBTQ + individuals, remains understudied. Adapting dyadic interventions may be particularly important for LGBTQ+ cancer survivors and their caregivers given that they face higher rates of psychological distress than their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. In the absence of interventions created for LGBTQ+ dyads facing cancer, we rely on adjacent literature: studies focused on dyadic interventions for a broader population of those affected by cancer, as well as those addressing LGBTQ+ individuals outside the context of cancer. Together, this literature illustrates an opportunity to address the psychological distress faced by LGBTQ+ individuals through dyadic approaches. Given the identified gap in the literature, however, there is a need for new research to explore how dyadic interventions can improve psychological well-being among LGBTQ+ people facing cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSexual and Gender MinoritiesCaregiversHumansQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalCancerDyadic copingDyadic interventionLGBTQ+

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.