ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using the Large-Scale Visual Language Models in Screening of Digestive Endoscopy.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China's response to the high prevalence of digestive tract diseases involves conducting large-scale endoscopic screening programs. However, the substantial diagnostic workload generated by these programs highlights a low staff-to-patient ratio. To address this challenge, we leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of endoscopic images. Specifically, we propose a CAD method that utilizes pre-trained large-scale vision-language models to support digestive endoscopy screening. This approach enables effective classification through the fusion of visual and textual information channels, making it particularly suitable for analyzing large-scale endoscopic datasets. Our model is trained on multicenter data collected from four hospitals, comprising 41,191 images that span 19 disease categories and four normal conditions. In comparative evaluations, our model outperforms eight state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, in a human-AI collaborative reading experiment, the model demonstrates superior diagnostic performance and faster decision-making times compared to six experienced endoscopists. These results underscore the model's effectiveness in CAD for digestive endoscopy. Despite certain limitations, this study highlights our continued efforts to advance AI-assisted diagnostics and envisions a future where AI-driven endoscopic diagnosis becomes a clinical reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.