ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Comparable magnitude of haptic size adaptation aftereffects between younger and older people.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual information is processed independently in each hemisphere at some processing stages. This hemispheric asymmetry is reported to decrease in older people, including for haptic sensation. It has been demonstrated that a prolonged bimanual touch with objects of specific sizes induces a perceptual adaptation aftereffect called haptic size adaptation aftereffect: adaptation to a large/small object in each hand alters the subsequent perceived size of tested objects on the hands as smaller/larger than their actual size. Given that the decrease in hemispheric asymmetry reflects an enhanced inter-hemispheric and inter-hands interaction in older people, an age-related difference in the haptic size adaptation aftereffect could be observed in a bimanual adaptation situation. Our first experiment tested this possibility in the situation where adaptation and test were touched in both hands. We found a comparable magnitude of the aftereffect between younger and older people. In the second experiment, we introduced a situation where adaptation was performed in one hand, and tests were performed with either the adapted or non-adapted hand using a haptic-to-visual size matching task. The aftereffect was only clearly observed for the adapted hand in younger people. However, with some procedural modifications, the third experiment again showed a comparable magnitude of aftereffect between younger and older participants for both two-handed and one-handed adaptations on the adapted hand test in the haptic-to-visual size matching task. Our results suggest that similar perceptual and neural mechanisms, including interhemispheric interactions, underlie haptic size perception in younger and older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.