Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794324›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Vascular leakage and angiogenesis in wound healing: a review.

Surasak Wichaiyo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Surasak WichaiyoDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, 447 Sri-Ayuthaya, Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. surasak.wic@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wound healing process involves a complex interplay of cells and molecules. Initial hemostasis occurs immediately after tissue injury, followed by overlapping phases of inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Vascular hyperpermeability peaks during the early phase and contributes to inflammatory responses such as hyperemia, edema, and exudate. Recently, emerging evidence has highlighted the role of vascular leakage in wound healing. This review outlines the characteristics of vascular hyperpermeability during wound repair and discusses potential mechanisms by which self-limited-but not excessive or prolonged-vascular leakage facilitates the healing process. Transient vascular hyperpermeability or localized intratissue bleeding during the inflammatory phase permits the entry of plasma-derived molecules into the wound. Extravasated fibrinogen, growth factors, and cells (e.g., platelets and red blood cells) promote healing, at least in part, by enhancing angiogenesis and reducing inflammation. Several substances and wound care products have demonstrated this effect in supporting wound repair. By contrast, excessive or chronic vascular leakage-such as that resulting from ineffective angiogenesis-impairs healing through various detrimental mechanisms, including chronic inflammation. Interestingly, although chronic vascular hyperpermeability contributes to delayed healing in diabetic foot ulcers, temporally controlled enhancement of vascular leakage may help restore the repair process by promoting effective angiogenesis and reducing inflammation. Together, these findings offer new insights into the role of vascular leakage in wound repair and suggest potential therapeutic strategies to enhance wound healing.

Indexed as

Capillary PermeabilityNeovascularization, PhysiologicWound HealingAngiogenesisAnimalsHumansInflammationAngiogenesisIntratissue bleedingVascular hyperpermeabilityVascular leakageWound healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.