ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Vascular leakage and angiogenesis in wound healing: a review.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy observation of wound care ointment (suile) on incision healing after mixed hemorrhoid surgery.BMC surgery · 2026Trial
- Article
- Multifunctional Prussian-Blue-Based Hydrogel for Photothermal Antibacterial and Infected Wound Regeneration.Polymers · 2026Article
- Nano-dicalcium silicate promotes angiogenesis via enhancing endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- From uric acid to tophi: multistage molecular and cellular mechanisms of tophi formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Current therapeutic strategies and available research models for investigating hypertrophic scars.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Endothelial system dysregulation underlies keloid development and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wound healing process involves a complex interplay of cells and molecules. Initial hemostasis occurs immediately after tissue injury, followed by overlapping phases of inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Vascular hyperpermeability peaks during the early phase and contributes to inflammatory responses such as hyperemia, edema, and exudate. Recently, emerging evidence has highlighted the role of vascular leakage in wound healing. This review outlines the characteristics of vascular hyperpermeability during wound repair and discusses potential mechanisms by which self-limited-but not excessive or prolonged-vascular leakage facilitates the healing process. Transient vascular hyperpermeability or localized intratissue bleeding during the inflammatory phase permits the entry of plasma-derived molecules into the wound. Extravasated fibrinogen, growth factors, and cells (e.g., platelets and red blood cells) promote healing, at least in part, by enhancing angiogenesis and reducing inflammation. Several substances and wound care products have demonstrated this effect in supporting wound repair. By contrast, excessive or chronic vascular leakage-such as that resulting from ineffective angiogenesis-impairs healing through various detrimental mechanisms, including chronic inflammation. Interestingly, although chronic vascular hyperpermeability contributes to delayed healing in diabetic foot ulcers, temporally controlled enhancement of vascular leakage may help restore the repair process by promoting effective angiogenesis and reducing inflammation. Together, these findings offer new insights into the role of vascular leakage in wound repair and suggest potential therapeutic strategies to enhance wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.