ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Optimizing ultrasound evaluation of carotid artery stenosis in Takayasu's Arteritis: a focus on residual inner diameter as a key parameter.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTakayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often leads to stenosis or occlusion of the common carotid artery (CCA), posing significant risks such as stroke and cognitive impairment. Despite the widespread use of ultrasound in diagnosing and monitoring TAK, the lack of standardized criteria for assessing CCA stenosis has resulted in inconsistent evaluations. This study aims to establish standardized ultrasound diagnostic criteria for CCA stenosis in TAK, focusing on residual inner diameter and wall thickness.
methodA total of 68 TAK patients with 120 CCAs and 120 healthy CCAs controls were included. Ultrasound examinations were performed using the iU22 Philips Healthcare system, with measurements of arterial wall thickness, inner and outer diameters, and carotid blood flow velocity. Head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) served as the gold standard for stenosis assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of various ultrasound parameters.
resultsThe study found that the residual inner diameter was the most reliable parameter for assessing CCA stenosis, with high diagnostic accuracy across all stenosis categories (ROC values of 0.901 for ≥ 50% and 0.969 for ≥ 70% stenosis). Cutoff values for the residual inner diameter were established at ≤ 0.505 cm for < 50% stenosis, ≤ 0.315 cm for ≥ 50% stenosis, and ≤ 0.285 cm for ≥ 70% stenosis, achieving high sensitivity and specificity. Wall thickness and the inner-to-outer diameter ratio were effective for identifying mild stenosis but showed declining accuracy with increasing stenosis severity.
conclusionsIn conclusion, this study provides standardized ultrasound diagnostic criteria for CCA stenosis in TAK, with the residual inner diameter emerging as the most reliable parameter. These findings have significant clinical implications for improving diagnostic accuracy, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring disease progression in TAK patients. Future research should focus on validating these criteria in larger, multicenter studies to further enhance the management of TAK. Key Points • This study establishes residual inner diameteras the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessing carotid artery stenosis in TAK, with high diagnostic accuracy across all stenosis categories. • Residual inner diameter demonstrated exceptional diagnostic superiority in evaluating carotid stenosis, particularly for moderate-to-severe cases. Its validated cutoff values achieved high sensitivity and specificity, aligning closely with CTA results. By providing clear, reproducible thresholds, residual inner diameter minimizes misdiagnosis and underdetection of high-risk stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.