ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Metagenomic insight into drought-induced changes in the Egyptian wheat rhizosphere microbiome.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterologous expression of DobHLH25 from Dendrobium officinale enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Genotype-Specific Interactions Between Wheat and Rhizosphere Microbiome Under Drought Stress.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Salt-Drought Co-Stress Impairs Root Ultrastructure, Remodels Rhizosphere Bacteria, and Suppresses Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing Plant-Microorganism Interactions to Mitigate Biotic and Abiotic Stresses for Sustainable Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microbial Biotechnology in Agriculture.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheat is one of the most important cereal crops and an important source of food for billions of people worldwide. However, drought stress can pose a real threat to its productivity and lead to significant yield losses, especially in Egypt. The rhizospheric microbiome of wheat can play an important role in drought stress and help wheat to respond to this abiotic stress. Understanding this microbiome is therefore also important to improve drought stress resilience and productivity. In this study, a metagenomic analysis was performed to investigate how the composition and diversity of microbial communities associated with the wheat rhizosphere change under drought. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses revealed a shift in microbial abundance, with Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia being the four most abundant phyla of the ethnic microbiota. Remarkably, other classes, including Alphaproteobacteria and Cytophagia, were significantly enriched under drought, which could be a promising enhancement of plant stress altruism. Differential abundance analysis showed that the control samples had higher abundance of microbial taxa such as OD1, WS2, Chlorobi, ABY1 and SHA-109 compared to the drought-treated genotypes. Functional prediction analysis using PICRUSt showed that an uncharacterized ATP-binding protein within the AAA + superfamily is overrepresented under drought conditions. This suggests that these genes may play a role in stress adaptation, possibly via energy-dependent regulation of cellular processes involved in plant survival. Our results expand our understanding of the complexity of responses of the wheat rhizosphere microbiome to drought and have practical implications for the development of microbial target combinations to improve wheat tolerance and productivity in the context of climate change challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.