ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the efficacy of [ MATERIALS AND
methodsOverall, 24 knees in 22 patients with refractory chronic inflammatory arthritis were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were assessed clinically for pain, tenderness, range of motion, analgesic intake, Oxford Knee Score, and scintigraphically based on blood pool activity on three-phase bone scan. Various scores were assigned to clinical these parameters. RSV of the knee joint was done using intra-articular injection of [
resultsOut of 24 knees, 18 knees were responders and 6 knees were non-responders at 3 months. There was a significant improvement in clinical scores at 1 month post-RSV, which persisted at 3 months post-RSV (p < 0.05). However, the change in blood pool activity on three-phase bone scan was not significant. Reported adverse effects were mild and not significant.
conclusionThis study confirmed the safety and efficacy of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.