ArticleTranslational stroke research2025
Exploring the Association Between Early PaCO
Article in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microcirculation and Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of stroke · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior clinical research demonstrated that rapid reduction in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO
methodsIn this prospective preclinical experimental study, six female pigs (mean weight: 50.75 ± 1.89 kg) were subjected to 15 min of ventricular fibrillation and were then supported by ECMO. The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was attempted in animals at 20 min post-ECMO initiation. Arterial blood gas (ABG) was sampled at specific time points, while arterial blood pressure (ABP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) were continuously monitored. Sweep gas flow was set relative to each animal's ECMO flow rate: 100% in the control group, 200% in the rapid correction group, and 25% in the slow correction group. PRx was computed as the Pearson correlation coefficient between 10-s average mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP values using 1-min windows updated every 30 s. Experimental phases were defined for data analysis, including baseline, fibrillation, ECMO I (0-10 min after ECMO initiation), ECMO II (10-20 min), and POST-R (post-ROSC, 20-30 min). Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess group-wise differences in ΔPRx over time. Histopathological analysis was performed to quantify neuronal injury across cortical and subcortical regions. Brain tissues were harvested and histologically analyzed for neuronal injury ischemia vulnerable regions: the midbrain, cerebellum, striatum in the basal ganglia, temporal cortex, hypothalamus, and hippocampus.
resultsIn the rapid group, PaCO
conclusionIn this experimental ECPR model, faster early PaCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.