ReviewDermatology and therapy2025
Evaluating Current and Emergent JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: A Narrative Review.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Skin cancer risk in alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Upadacitinib for Severe Alopecia Areata in Adults and Adolescents: Two Phase 3 UP-AA Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA dermatology · 2026Article
- Lipid nanocarriers as innovative strategies for hair regrowth.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Beyond Cytotoxicity: Hair Follicle Immune Privilege Collapse and JAK-STAT Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Public Interest in Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: A Google Trend Analysis.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Treatment preferences by disease severity in alopecia areata: A cross-sectional survey study.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Case Reports of Alopecia Areata Associated With Apical Periodontitis.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Stem cell-based approaches for alopecia: A narrative review of current and emerging treatment strategies.Cell transplantationReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition characterized by non-scarring hair loss on the scalp, face, and body, affecting approximately 2% of the global population. Current treatments, including topical corticosteroids, topical immunotherapies, and systemic immunosuppressants, often demonstrate inconsistent efficacy and raise concerns about long-term safety, emphasizing the need for safer and more effective therapies. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a promising treatment option, offering a targeted approach by addressing the immune-mediated mechanisms driving hair follicle destruction in AA. Recent clinical advances have led to FDA approval of three JAK inhibitors-baricitinib, ritlecitinib, and deuruxolitinib-based on pivotal trials showing significant hair regrowth. Baricitinib has demonstrated durable efficacy, with 35-40% of patients achieving a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤ 20 at 36 weeks. Ritlecitinib similarly reported 23% of patients achieving a SALT score ≤ 20 at week 24. Deuruxolitinib has also shown efficacy with 31% of patients achieving a SALT score ≤ 20 at 24 weeks. Off-label use of JAK inhibitors like tofacitinib and ruxolitinib have also demonstrated efficacy in limited studies. This review aims to consolidate and summarize the latest clinical evidence and trial data on JAK inhibitors for AA, providing an up-to-date resource for clinicians and researchers to guide evidence-based management and optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.