ArticleIntensive care medicine2025
Hemodynamic and neurological presentations of invasive meningococcal disease in adults: a nationwide study across 100+ French ICUs : The RETRO-MENINGO study.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infectious meningitis and encephalitis: A primer for acute care practitioners.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Review
- Invasive meningococcal disease: from coma to septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare but potentially fatal infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis. In adults requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU), IMD typically presents with two distinct clinical presentations: neurological (meningitis) and hemodynamic (sepsis). These presentations are often conflated, despite the differences in pathophysiology and outcome.
methodsRETRO-MENINGO is a nationwide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study conducted in 102 French ICUs between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2024. Adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the ICU with a microbiologically confirmed IMD were categorised as having either a neurological or a hemodynamic presentation according to the main reason for ICU admission. The primary outcome was day-60 mortality in each presentation.
resultsOf 654 patients (median age 33 years [IQR 21-56]; 63.5% without comorbidities), 407 (62%) had a neurological and 247 (38%) a hemodynamic presentation at ICU admission. Hemodynamic presentation was associated with older age (39.0 vs. 30.0 years; p = 0.001), immunosuppression (17.0% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001), purpuric rash (55.9% vs. 43.7%; p = 0.003), earlier ICU admission (1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.001) and more frequent bacteremia (83.8% vs. 35.6%; p < 0.001). Serogroup B was predominant in neurological presentation, whereas serogroup W135 was more common in hemodynamic presentation. Compared to neurological presentation, hemodynamic presentation required more organ support (vasopressors, invasive mechanical ventilation, transfusions, renal replacement therapy) and had a significantly higher day-60 mortality (25.5% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic presentation (aOR 4.33, 95% CI 2.26-8.62; p < 0.001), absence of comorbidities (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.19-4.23; p = 0.014), age > 35 years (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.73-6.07; p < 0.001), arterial lactate level > 5 mmol/L (aOR 2.60, 95% CI 1.43-4.77; p = 0.002) and symptom onset < 24 h (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.00-3.55; p = 0.040) were independently associated with day-60 mortality, while early administration of a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin prior to ICU admission was strongly protective (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.55; p < 0.001).
conclusionNeurological and hemodynamic presentation of IMD are clinically and prognostically distinct. Recognition of these phenotypes is critical for appropriate management and prediction of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40794167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.