Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794167›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2025

Hemodynamic and neurological presentations of invasive meningococcal disease in adults: a nationwide study across 100+ French ICUs : The RETRO-MENINGO study.

Damien Contou, Benoit Painvin, Delphine Daubin, Arthur Orieux, Hugo Pirollet, Martin Cour, Benjamine Sarton, Marie Gauvrit, Mathilde Taillantou-Candau, Paola Lepoutre and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Damien ContouService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy, Argenteuil, France. damien.contou@ch-argenteuil.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-507X
Benoit PainvinService des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Delphine DaubinRéanimation de Médecine Intensive Réanimation-Grands Brûlés, CHU Lapeyronie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Arthur OrieuxService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Pellegrin et Hôpital Saint-André, place Amélie Raba Léon, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Hugo PirolletService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Michallon-Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France.
Martin CourService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Lyon, Lyon, France.
Benjamine SartonService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Marie GauvritService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Nantes Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Mathilde Taillantou-CandauService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
Paola LepoutreService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Bretonneau de Tours, Tours, France.
Guillaume LouisRéanimation Polyvalente et USC, CHR Metz-Thionville, Metz, France.
Fabrice BruneelService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital André Mignot, CH Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.
Christelle TeitenService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
Maud VincendeauService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Marion GiryService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Rouen, Univ Rouen Normandie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm Dynamicure UMR1311, Rouen, France.
François LegayService de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France.
Rémi CoudroyMédecine Intensive Réanimation, INSERM CIC 1402- IS-ALIVE Research Group, Poitiers, France.
Olivier PuigMédecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université Paris Cité-AP-HP-Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Pierre BayService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Guillaume SchnellRéanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, CHG Jacques Monod, Le Havre, France.
Geoffrey LedouxMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital R.Salengro, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
Romain SonnevilleMédecine Intensive-Réanimation, APHP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Danielle ReuterRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
Xavier ValetteService de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, CHU de CAEN, Caen, France.
Piotr SzychowiakMédecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Nicolas DufourRéanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital NOVO, Site de Pontoise, Pontoise, France.
Tomas UrbinaService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Antoine-GHU Sorbonne Université-AP-HP, Paris, France.
Gaëtan PlantefèveService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy, Argenteuil, France.
Nicolas de ProstService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Retro-Méningo Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare but potentially fatal infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis. In adults requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU), IMD typically presents with two distinct clinical presentations: neurological (meningitis) and hemodynamic (sepsis). These presentations are often conflated, despite the differences in pathophysiology and outcome.

methodsRETRO-MENINGO is a nationwide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study conducted in 102 French ICUs between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2024. Adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the ICU with a microbiologically confirmed IMD were categorised as having either a neurological or a hemodynamic presentation according to the main reason for ICU admission. The primary outcome was day-60 mortality in each presentation.

resultsOf 654 patients (median age 33 years [IQR 21-56]; 63.5% without comorbidities), 407 (62%) had a neurological and 247 (38%) a hemodynamic presentation at ICU admission. Hemodynamic presentation was associated with older age (39.0 vs. 30.0 years; p = 0.001), immunosuppression (17.0% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001), purpuric rash (55.9% vs. 43.7%; p = 0.003), earlier ICU admission (1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.001) and more frequent bacteremia (83.8% vs. 35.6%; p < 0.001). Serogroup B was predominant in neurological presentation, whereas serogroup W135 was more common in hemodynamic presentation. Compared to neurological presentation, hemodynamic presentation required more organ support (vasopressors, invasive mechanical ventilation, transfusions, renal replacement therapy) and had a significantly higher day-60 mortality (25.5% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic presentation (aOR 4.33, 95% CI 2.26-8.62; p < 0.001), absence of comorbidities (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.19-4.23; p = 0.014), age > 35 years (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.73-6.07; p < 0.001), arterial lactate level > 5 mmol/L (aOR 2.60, 95% CI 1.43-4.77; p = 0.002) and symptom onset < 24 h (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.00-3.55; p = 0.040) were independently associated with day-60 mortality, while early administration of a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin prior to ICU admission was strongly protective (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.55; p < 0.001).

conclusionNeurological and hemodynamic presentation of IMD are clinically and prognostically distinct. Recognition of these phenotypes is critical for appropriate management and prediction of outcome.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsMeningococcal InfectionsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNeisseria meningitidisRetrospective StudiesICUMeningitisMeningococcalNeisseria meningitidisPurpura fulminansSepsisVaccination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.