Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40794135›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2025

Improved CTA imaging for stroke evaluation - deep learning and iterative reconstruction comparative study.

Michal Pula, Emilia Kucharczyk, Marcin Piersiak, Maciej Ziomek, Agata Zdanowicz-Ratajczyk, Maciej Guzinski

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michal PulaDepartment of General Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University Hospital, Wrocław, Poland. michal.pula97@gmail.com.
Emilia KucharczykWroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Marcin Piersiak4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Maciej ZiomekWroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Agata Zdanowicz-RatajczykDepartment of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Maciej GuzinskiDepartment of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University SUBZ.C270.25.092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compares a novel reconstruction algorithm deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) for CTA in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, emphasizing DLIR's potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and visualization of large vessel occlusion.

methodsThis study retrospectively assessed 108 consecutive AIS-suspected emergency department patients (mean age 72.3 years +/- 17) who underwent head and neck CTA with DLIR and ASIR-V reconstructions. The analysis compared the impact of DLIR versus ASIR-V on image quality, assessing signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and contrast-enhanced arteries homogeneity computed on mean HU values and SD in six regions of interest located in head and neck including three arteries.

resultsThe DLIR reconstruction allowed for significant SNR and CNR improvement, with the largest SNR distinction obtained in the common carotid artery (52.29% increased SNR) and white matter of the pons (63.98% increased SNR). Among the three regions subject to CNR evaluation DLIR yielded superiority in the neck and posterior cerebral fossa while ASIR-V accounted for higher CNR in the medial cerebral fossa (MCF). Additionally, DLIR-reconstructed images achieved a 21.10% improvement in arterial homogeneity, enhancing the visualization of potential occlusion.

conclusionDLIR yields superior image quality of the contrast-enhanced head and neck structures in CTA, providing artery images with increased homogeneity and potentially allowing for more proficient occlusion evaluation specifically in the area of the posterior cerebral fossa. However, this technique faces challenges in the visualization of MCF.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningIschemic StrokeRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaAngiographyDeep learningDLIRHead CTAStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.